Comments on: Einstein Coefficient Relation https://winnerscience.com/einstein-coefficient-relations/ Science Articles for Winners Mon, 04 Sep 2023 16:47:37 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 By: amsh https://winnerscience.com/einstein-coefficient-relations/#comment-1997 Mon, 04 Sep 2023 16:47:37 +0000 https://winnerscience.com/?p=2886#comment-1997 In reply to Anshul Sharma.

Please check again

]]> By: Anshul Sharma https://winnerscience.com/einstein-coefficient-relations/#comment-1989 Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:35:59 +0000 https://winnerscience.com/?p=2886#comment-1989 You made a mistake in elaborating the significance.
Its must be corrected to, the ratio of Einstein coefficient of spontanious emission to Einstein coefficient of stimulated emission.

]]> By: lkl https://winnerscience.com/einstein-coefficient-relations/#comment-1169 Wed, 10 Mar 2021 11:09:01 +0000 https://winnerscience.com/?p=2886#comment-1169 In reply to gaa.

for a two level energy system it is impossible to have a LASER. The enegy levels have to be 3or 4 or above to have a population invertion thus we can have a greater stimulated emmision than absorbsion.

]]> By: Sushmita seth https://winnerscience.com/einstein-coefficient-relations/#comment-850 Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:31:13 +0000 https://winnerscience.com/?p=2886#comment-850 Thank u for this ans. it’s very helpful for me.

]]> By: gaa https://winnerscience.com/einstein-coefficient-relations/#comment-605 Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:24:34 +0000 https://winnerscience.com/?p=2886#comment-605 How does probability of absorption is reduced compared to stimulated emission?
In LASERs, do trigger photons used in continuous mode?

]]>